The writer points: "It would be better to have cooperation, but where it is not possible, perhaps the same kind of incentive structures could work in other areas, too." This kind of structure is included in the more abstract, new paradigm with itś - firstly- a new kind of Thinking: not by a Dualistic- Absolutistic way as in the current paradigm, but by "a relativistic way", thus learning to apply Albert Einstein's Relativity theory to the Philosophy too, together with another grand-theoretical approach of Ludwig von Bertalanffy and his System theory. But I would "abstract a little bit more"- as an alternative thinker, educated in Philosophy and Social sciences, and trying to build up my "Real Change- approach" with my suggestion and long-term developing, alone, of my suggestion for a new paradigm of science since 1974. Well written and I agree with the main points of this interesting article. Zoellick called “responsible stakeholders.” With enough time, the argument went, they would become what then-US Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. The hope was that bringing even recalcitrant countries into the tent would make them less likely to want to burn it down. The West’s instinct was to emphasize the universalist nature of these institutions and expand their scope. This development may come as a surprise to those who, in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War, had bet on the transformative power of the post-1945 global governance institutions.
To paraphrase India’s foreign minister, the West’s problems are no longer the world’s problems.
In a world of rapidly evolving power dynamics, a silent revolution is reshaping multilateralism and increasingly leaving the West and its institutions behind. But NATO’s new vitality belies a larger problem: the West’s failure to convince the rest of the world that it also has a stake in Ukraine’s defense is emblematic of a broader shift. BERLIN – When NATO leaders descend on Vilnius this month for the alliance’s annual summit, they will demonstrate that the organization, newly united behind support for Ukraine, is far from “ brain dead,” as French President Emmanuel Macron infamously described it in 2019.
0 kommentar(er)
